Press Kit

For journalists and researchers

Quotable stats, founder bio, brand assets, and a guarantee: every claim on this page traces to a database record we maintain quarterly.

press@wheretoemigrate.io Data sources →

Citable headline stats

1,500+
visa & residency programmes
200
countries covered
99%
programmes traced to a government source URL
21
distinct programme categories
92%
programmes lead to permanent residency
945
programmes lead to citizenship eligibility
72h
SLA for mid-cycle rule changes
€10–30
price per personalized report

One-paragraph description

"whereTOemigrate.io is an independent visa intelligence platform covering +1,500+ visa and residency programmes across 190+ countries. A 14-question quiz produces a per-country verdict — Eligible or Almost eligible — ranked against the user's nationality, savings, profession, age, family status, language ability, and stated priorities. Every visa pathway is traced to its issuing government's official immigration portal. Operated from by founder Antonio Mira; positioned as the research phase before a user hires immigration counsel."

Founder quotes (use freely with attribution)

"Most emigration sites tell you which countries exist. Almost none tell you which ones are realistically viable for *your* profile. That gap is the entire reason this platform exists."

"The cheapest valuable thing in emigration research is a clear *no*. We tell users which countries to take off their list before they spend €5,000 on a consultation that would have reached the same conclusion."

— Antonio Mira, on the AVOID verdict

"99% of the +2,500+ programmes in our database link to the issuing government's own URL. The 1% that don't are flagged as draft and excluded from public reports. That's the floor for what 'verified' should mean in this space — and most aggregators don't clear it."

— Antonio Mira, on data provenance

"The scoring engine is mathematically sound but unvalidated against real outcome data. We disclose that publicly because the alternative — pretending we have a closed feedback loop — would be the exact opposite of what we're trying to be."

— Antonio Mira, on the engine's open epistemic gap

"Of the +2,500+ programmes we track, 48% have no published path to permanent residency. People apply for those without realising their visa is a ten-year cul-de-sac. Surfacing that asymmetry is the whole point of the indices we publish."

— Antonio Mira, on the Time-to-Stability Index

Top countries by programme count (2026)

A "programme" is a distinct visa or residency pathway with its own eligibility criteria, fees, and processing timeline. Each entry is verified against the issuing government's portal.

RankCountryProgrammes
1United Arab Emirates23
2Kenya20
3South Korea19
4Uganda18
5–9Colombia, Germany, Latvia, Portugal, United States17 each
10Rwanda16

Original research — six indices

All six indices are public, free, and built from the same +1,500+-programme database. Use the data with attribution: "whereTOemigrate.io ([wheretoemigrate.io/data-sources](/data-sources))".

Founder bio (short)

Antonio Mira is the founder of whereTOemigrate.io. Personally relocated across multiple jurisdictions. Designs the visa-matching scoring engine, maintains the +1,500+-programme database, and writes the methodology that ranks countries on the Eligible / Almost verdict framework. Editorial standards and contact at /founder.

Brand assets

Suggested attribution

"According to whereTOemigrate.io, an independent visa intelligence
platform covering 2,500+ visa programmes across 190+ countries…"

(short link: wheretoemigrate.io/data-sources)

Press contact

Press inquiries: press@wheretoemigrate.io

Founder: Antonio Mira,

Response SLA: 24 hours weekdays, 48 hours weekends.

Available for: data licensing, custom dataset queries, on-the-record commentary on visa-policy changes, podcast and interview requests, fact-checking of immigration claims that cite our data, and white-label partnerships with immigration law firms.

See the full methodology

The scoring engine, the data sources, the editorial standards — fully documented and citable.

Read methodology → View data sources →